DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Tom Ryan's reply to the SPC theory point
- Subject: Re: Tom Ryan's reply to the SPC theory point
- From: GrantBlair@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:44:54 EDT
In a message dated 9/11/2001 2:23:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
RDeRoeck@alphaind.com writes:
<< Sampling Plan-1 uses n=13,c=0
Sampling Plan-2 uses n=50,c=1
Sampling Plan-2 uses n=80,c=2
Let's say the supplier's quality level (p) for this lot is 0.05 defective >>
I'm reminded of the "urban legend" about a customer who specifed a quality
level of 3 defects per thousand in his contract. When he received his first
shipment of 1000 parts, it included 3 parts in a separate bag, along with an
apologetic letter from his Japanese supplier explaining that, although he
didn't understand the strange request, the required number of defects were
produced, and included, as requested.
Sorry Rich, but the most important number is C. If C ain't 0, nothing else
matters, even if you sample 100% of the
product, which is was the original condition given in my example. In my
example, we made a product which met customer requirements. The example you
give would not.
GrantBlair@aol.com
Ninety Six SC
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index