DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: den.list-d Digest V2002 #4
- Subject: Re: den.list-d Digest V2002 #4
- From: IAMCOENS@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 19:07:51 EST
In a message dated 01/23/2002 12:03:07 AM Eastern Standard Time,
den.list-d-request@deming.ces.clemson.edu writes:
Steve Prevette writes about Dr. Deming reviewing cultures and comments:
> "Dr. Deming typically reviewed sick day records, and did worker interviews
> and got a pretty good idea of the culture or "attitude" of the organization
> he was working with. I believe you can infer information about attitude
> from surveys and interviews and walking around with your eyes open. There
> are probably other good measurables, such as sick days, and inappropriate
use of the company Internet access. "
Probably consistent with Dr. D's caution about data and theory, I got an
early lesson as a graduate student doing research in the late 1970's at the
Harmon Industry auto part plant in Bolivar Tennessee---it was a very
successful "quality of worklife" initiative, a project with involvement by
Einar Thorsrud from Norway, Michael Maccoby at Harvard, and Erich Fromm at
Berkeley, and leader Michael Duckles. I thought I knew something as a
graduate student in industrial relations, but knew little---I asked Mike
Duckles, the site coordinator, about the sick leave measurement---he said
they did not consider a reduction in sick days as necessarily good---their
initiative had helped many people gain self esteem---previously some did not
respect themselves enough to stay home when sick and they came to work with a
102 fever. After the initiative, they felt different. Of course, it could be
the opposite for other individuals, all which demonstrates the danger of
aggregating this kind on data on one assumption.
I got a similar lesson on the employee turnover issue. It was plainly a
better workplace, but people also grew and learned that their life calling
was something other than de-burring metal in a Quonset hut. The company and
workers even had the local community college offer classes on site during the
lunch hour, so people could go into health professions (a hospital was the
only other major employer in this small rural community) So again, turnover
of some individuals was a signal of individual growth and success, not a
problem indicator.
Too often when we don't do the deeper thinking and investigation, we
can making some sweeping generalizations that are not always correct---I can
imagine Dr. D nodding to this conclusion.
all the best
Tom Coens
Quantum Paradigms
P.O. Box 188
East Lansing, 48826-0188
Phone/Fax: (517) 333-4459
IAMCOENS@aol.com
abolishappraisals.com
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index