DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Why not Deming? - meaning of quality*
- Subject: Re: Why not Deming? - meaning of quality*
- From: David Kerridge <dfkerridge@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 17:18:30 +0000
At 11:46 am -0500 4/2/04, Roger Erickson wrote:
I'm struggling with how to define quality without reference to
whether you're making the system better or not.
A further thought.
In "Out of the Crisis" WED defines quality by using a diagram. This
is a system definition, but of a different kind from usual.
I use a simplified form, which can be found on my web site
http://homepage.mac.com/dfkerridge
Look for "Triangle.pdf" in the section headed "Statistics Group"
--
Best wishes
David
dfkerridge@mac.com
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index