DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Education
- Subject: Re: Education
- From: "John E. Purchase" <jopur@muskoka.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:00:26 -0400
On Oct 12, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Jim Walker wrote (in part):
- - - The school system, as I like to label it, is mostly trying to
respond to the
atomistic nature of the environment (here) it which it finds itself.
The
individual learner reigns supreme, in theory. It would be a pleasant
modification of current practices to be able to compare and contrast
based
on a consistent evaluation paradigm.
However, we are easily seduced in this culture into believing that we
need
to have a large array of pedagogical methods and systems in play...at
the
same time... the better to respond to the 'individual needs' of the
learner.
Jim will remember from his participation in an educational forum in
Canada that there are other strong forces which try to have their
visions of education (public in particular) reign supreme. The "
parent as customer" is one (my child must be served according to my
needs and expectations). There are fiscal conservatives who seem to
begrudge society its desire to have a well educated population (except
as it serves vested interest). Anti-professional and anti-union
sentiments are maintained by the same or related agendas.
A theme that comes out in all of them is "Change" (to the proponents'
point of view) but rarely "Improvement" (in what they pejoratively
label as "the status quo").
Off forum I have supplied Brian Wood with a list of references on
educational evaluation, marks, marking systems, and reporting. It
is my observation that measurement and evaluation are not taught well
for teacher certification for the purposes of regular application in
the classroom. On the other hand, plenty of courses are given on the
use and interpretation of standardised tests in education and
psychology.
The unfortunate thing, according to Bruce Biddle and David Berliner
writing out of Arizona State University, is that too much of what the
special interest groups see a problems with public education are myths
based on misrepresentation.
John E. Purchase
Public Educator- Retired
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index