DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Red Beads
- Subject: Re: Red Beads
- From: Chris Game <chrisgame@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:57:13 +0000
- Disposition-notification-to: Chris Game <chrisgame@bigfoot.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
I see some posts to the list about a simulator for the red bead
experiment. I wonder what this will show that is not apparent from
the statistics? The sampling model for the experiment is relatively
trivial, and most students can cope with the maths.
This raises a point I've often wondered - what is the training value
of the experiment? The results are (statistically) predictable and
any variation from them is usually the result of an imperfect
sampling paddle or physical differences between the two colours of
bead. Of course it shows random variations can affect processes, but
this is (generally) obvious.
Is there anything more to it? What is the training value to justify
the time spent on running the trials and so on?
Perhaps people can tell me how the attitudes and thinking of the
students/trainees is changed after a typical session involving the
experiment?
Chris Game.
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index