DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Images of Taylor
- Subject: Re: Images of Taylor
- From: "John K. Balor" <balor1999@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PvYt6w1vDfWgC+HZ+remV+w2KW4F5sb2VEecQDCDecYQjBZ7t2jAYFeg0psAiMlL2oYSNfG+J8tiUY+daumEH+Mu0uRkrqXESe7sy7t6/47XnI3dwdZxvsxFh9Dj5jL4qpoE0cJEXwy1u/Vbyc7jleczfkUiCbn4JoNFsg4sYsw= ;
I agree with John Majerus that Gareth Morgan's 'Image of Organization' is a wonderful book that is both enjoyable to read and produces lots of thoughts and ideas. While it is a good idea to talk of the importance of metaphors, I think it works perhaps best when Morgan talks about when the machine metaphor is good, when it's useful to think of the organization as a biological shape, as flux, a politics, and so on.
His critisism of Taylor when he talks of the organization as a machine makes as little sense as when he is critisising Deming when talking about the organization as a brain.
To my knowledge, Taylor never spoke of the organization as a machine, and Deming never talked about the organization as a brain.
What these two geniuses of management talked about, however, was the organization as a system and how we should use the method of science ("scientific management") for systematical analsys and improvement.
These are timeless ideas that have nothing to do with metaphors. I don't understand why some people on this forum seem to have a problem with science. I was expecting most of the DEN to have a similar background as that of Taylor and Deming, namely engineers and scientists. Some of the things beeing said on this forum would have made Deming turn in his grave, I think.
John Balor
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index