DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Maximum vs Fair and Reasonable
- Subject: RE: Maximum vs Fair and Reasonable
- From: roger.tov@btinternet.com
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:12:48 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:From:Subject:Content-Type; b=aTIFHw4+V9Fa8VWDFKBz/YKtMUVd3WEQ3mgYTEJE7RwQwMMt5KkD8yjoO8F9UZ6PgMRghYSDA9HKL846W2ZVHRq4XK816u7DgS8InK4wcnpgJGBXk24SbzU+7cNRix3JFuDAvLR1Bgqly1ywrC9LJp3SA0rmREdB83R8MAsgYBE= ;
Hi All
Why do organisations exist - the reason for their starting may be
lost in the ists of time, and current regulation in the UK (and I
guess the US and elsewhere) is that a publicly quoted company has but
one obligation - maximisation of shareholder value. However I often
ask in relation to this - Why is your company in existance? - to
which the reply is ofen "to make a profit", or, "to maximise
shareholder value." Which brings the second question - "Why are you
not making and selling crack cocaine then - possibly the best returns
on investment going?" The introduction of all the legal and moral
reasoning then identifies that the organisation exists for much more
reason than to make a profit (which is possibly the least important
thing it MUST do) and opens up a whole raft of other reasons. This
is starting to get the organisation to move from thinking
operationally into tactical - or god forbid - strategic thinking.
However the shrot-termism of Western stockmarkes do drag us back to
short term profit and low level operational thinking....
R
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index