DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Deming and accountability
- Subject: Re: Deming and accountability
- From: FVoehl@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:29:58 EDT
In a message dated 7/6/99 2:50:14 AM, TQNELSON@AOL.com writes:
<< As Dr. said (and I have cited before [ref. TNE pp 106-107]) it only takes
one
"unexplained failure" to totally disprove a theory. If that theory is valid,
how can you explain ANY of the currently failing, some now even imprisoned,
past "A"
students, the rewarded--then fired workers, the now imprisoned, once
esteemed, business and government executives, the sports idols "fallen from
grace," >>
This is a broad statement made by Dr. Deming, and amplified by Del, and might
be disputed by Edison and his team of 85 scientists, if they were alive
today. In Edison's efforts to perfect the electric light bulb, his
experiments failed many thousands of times. Most of the time, he and his
assistants knew the reasons for the failure. But not always. They chalked
up these unexplained failures to *things unknowable* but continued to search
for the *better way.*
Had they taken the one unexplained failure theory to heart and abandoned the
theory, many of Edison's successes would never have been achieved. Sometimes
the experiment is flawed, unknowingly, and the reasons for failure cannot be
explained. This does not mean that the theory is incorrect. It sometimes
means that more information is needed in order to move ahead until they can
get it right. For those that gave up along the way--or veered from the right
path--it might be argued that they gave up too soon. Edison's motto was:
There is a better way--find it!
Frank Voehl (FVoehl@aol.com)
=========================================================================
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index