DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Deming and accountability
- Subject: Re: Deming and accountability
- From: TQNELSON@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 23:24:19 EDT
In a message dated 7/6/1999 8:56:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, FVoehl@AOL.COM
writes:
<< Had they taken the one unexplained failure theory to heart and abandoned
the
theory, >>
But they DID! A theory leads to prediction. Each time Edison made a
prediction, he then tested it, and each time it failed he revised it, changed
the structure, voltage, etc., of the bulb to be tested. He did not keep
repeating the same failed test time, after time, after time. He did exactly
as WED said, implementing in fact, long before the formal wording, the PDSA
cycle.
One reason this may seem difficult to many people is that there are levels of
theory and sub-theory, just as there are levels of systems and subsystems.
Edison had a main theory of "What and Why" and this, eventually proved valid.
But he had a sub-theory of "Where, When, and How" that failed and needed
revising for each of those failures. He had no problem with this. Do we?
Del Nelson
American River College
When "We, the People..." have been replaced
by dollars, profits, and greed,
It is time to start over
=====================================================================
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index