DEN Discussion List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
optimizing education
- Subject: optimizing education
- From: SyThink@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:28:02 EDT
Wednesday, August 11, 1999
It is my theory that if one were to thoroughly apply Deming's principles,
especially his concepts of system optimization, to education systems, several
traditional practices in addition to "A" "B+" etc. type grades (discussed
recently on the DEN) would be sloughed off. These would probably include:
-- 12 years of grade school usually preceded by kindergarten and possibly
followed by college (this is the U.S. model). (Why 12 years? Why not 13 or
5 or 16 or 3 or 28? What are the years *for*?)
-- Divisions called "preschools," "elementary schools," "middle schools,"
"high schools," "colleges," and "universities." (Are these divisions
helpful, or more an arbitrary function of tradition? Might they not be
suboptimizing intrasystem barriers?)
-- Semesters or terms, as they are known now. (What if a semester is too
little or too much to do the job?)
-- Classes or courses, as they are known now. (What if a body of knowledge
needs a different kind of unit?)
-- Credit-hours and transcripts. (Any necessary relation to competence?)
-- High school diplomas, college and university degrees. (Again, any
necessary relation to competence?)
-- "Honor" societies; separate "honors" curricula and colleges. (Deming
nightmare.)
-- Tests or evaluations after which nothing is necessarily done if a student
scores below all-correct. (Lost opportunity.)
-- Textbooks that every student uses. (Is a single, given textbook optimally
suited to serve all learners in a given instance in time?)
Here are a few features of what I would imagine a Deming-based education
system would look like:
-- A wide menu of services, and service delivery options, would be available
to serve the precise, moment-in-time needs of individual learners, for a full
range of existing development and competency.
-- Useful standards for competencies would be developed as needed by society,
and these standards would be operationally defined by specific demonstrations
of competency.
-- Teaching methods would be designed for maximum synergy of effect. Subject
matters would be integrated to match reality.
-- People would be motivated to learn because it is satisfying and joyful,
not because they will get bad mark if they don't.
-- The system would have the means to constantly evolve and improve its own
activities.
Mike Makepeace
systemsThink
http://www.sythink.com
P O Box 811 / Fennville MI 49408
ph. 616 857-5520
====================================================================
DEN Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index